Maximize Your Retirement Contributions to Lower Taxes

Katherine Leonard, CPA, CFP®

Katherine Leonard, CPA, CFP®

Financial Advisor · Founder, KCL Wealth Management

Katherine Leonard, CPA, CFP®, is the founder of KCL Wealth Management, a fee-only Newport Beach advisory firm specializing in tax-efficient financial planning and investment management.

Maximizing retirement contributions can be one of the most effective ways for high-income earners to build long-term wealth while managing taxes. But the strategy is not simply to contribute as much as possible to every account available.

The more useful question is which retirement accounts should you fund, in what order, and should those contributions be pre-tax or Roth?

For high-income professionals and business owners in California, those decisions can have meaningful tax consequences. The right strategy depends on your current income, expected future tax rate, employer benefits, business income, existing retirement assets, and how much flexibility you want before and during retirement.

Rather than treating retirement contributions as an annual box to check, I prefer to look at them as part of the broader tax and investment plan.

Which Retirement Account Should You Fund First?

For many employees, the employer-sponsored retirement plan is the logical place to start, particularly when the employer offers a matching contribution.

A 401(k), 403(b), or similar plan can allow you to invest substantially more for retirement than an IRA alone. Depending on the plan, contributions may be made on a traditional pre-tax basis, a Roth basis, or a combination of the two.

If your employer offers a match, contributing enough to receive the full available match is usually an attractive first step because you are taking advantage of compensation your employer is offering as part of your benefits package. From there, the appropriate order becomes more individualized. An HSA, additional employer-plan contributions, Roth strategies, taxable investing, or a retirement plan connected to self-employment could each become relevant.

Should High-Income Earners Choose a Pre-Tax or Roth 401(k)?

High-income earners often benefit from considering pre-tax 401(k) contributions during high-tax years, while Roth contributions may become more attractive during lower-income years. The decision ultimately depends on the tax rate you pay today compared with the tax rate you expect to face when the money is withdrawn.

Traditional pre-tax contributions generally reduce current taxable income. Roth 401(k) contributions do not provide the same current federal income-tax reduction, but qualified future distributions, including qualifying earnings, can be received tax-free.

For someone earning a significant income in California, the current deduction from a pre-tax contribution can be particularly valuable.

That does not mean every high earner should automatically choose traditional contributions.

Suppose you normally have substantial income but take a sabbatical, retire partway through the year, or have a temporary decline in business income. A lower-income year can change the relative value of Roth contributions.

The decision can also change over time. Someone might favor pre-tax contributions during peak earning years, then deliberately build additional Roth assets during lower-income periods. Having both pre-tax and Roth assets can eventually create more flexibility over where retirement spending comes from and how much taxable income you recognize.

How Do Pre-Tax Retirement Contributions Lower Your Taxes?

Pre-tax employee contributions to a traditional 401(k) generally reduce the amount of current wages included in federal taxable income, although they remain subject to certain payroll taxes.

For high-income taxpayers, reducing adjusted gross income can also affect other income-based calculations.

This is one reason retirement contributions should be reviewed as part of the tax projection rather than decided independently.

For example, imagine an executive receives a much larger bonus than usual. Before simply investing the additional cash in a brokerage account, it is worth checking whether she has fully used the retirement-plan opportunities available through her employer.

That does not mean the contribution should be made solely for the deduction. The money is still being committed to a retirement account with its own distribution rules. But if retirement savings were already part of the plan, the tax benefit can make the contribution even more valuable.

Should High-Income Earners Max Out Their 401(k)?

High-income earners should usually evaluate whether maximizing a 401(k) fits their overall savings and tax strategy, but maxing it out is not automatically the right decision for everyone.

Employer plans offer valuable tax advantages, but retirement accounts also reduce access to the money compared with an ordinary taxable brokerage account.

A client saving aggressively for retirement may reasonably maximize an employer plan each year.

Someone anticipating a home purchase, business investment, or another large liquidity need may want more of the next dollar invested in a taxable account.

The right answer comes from coordinating retirement savings with the rest of the financial plan rather than treating the annual contribution limit as a target that must always be reached. Because retirement-plan limits are periodically adjusted, I generally prefer to check the applicable IRS limit each year rather than build a long-term strategy around a specific dollar figure. For example, the employee elective-deferral limit increased again for 2026.

Why High-Income Earners Should Consider an HSA

If you are eligible to contribute to a Health Savings Account, an HSA can be an especially valuable part of a long-term tax and retirement strategy.

HSAs receive favorable tax treatment at multiple stages. Eligible contributions can generally receive tax-favored treatment, money can remain invested within the account, and distributions used for qualified medical expenses can be tax-free.

Unlike many healthcare spending arrangements, you do not have to empty an HSA at the end of the year. Funds can remain in the account and potentially accumulate over a long period.

For someone who can comfortably pay current healthcare expenses from cash flow, that creates an interesting planning opportunity. Rather than routinely withdrawing from the HSA for today's medical bills, some investors choose to leave the account invested for future qualified healthcare costs. An HSA should not be described as a retirement account in the same way as a 401(k) or IRA, and eligibility requirements apply. But for someone who qualifies, it deserves a place in the retirement-savings conversation.

Can High-Income Earners Still Contribute to a Roth IRA?

High-income taxpayers may be unable to contribute directly to a Roth IRA because direct Roth IRA contributions are subject to income limitations. A properly executed backdoor Roth strategy may still provide a way to fund a Roth IRA.

The basic strategy involves making a nondeductible contribution to a traditional IRA and subsequently converting eligible funds to a Roth IRA.

The important complication is the pro-rata rule.

If you already have pre-tax money in traditional, SEP, or SIMPLE IRAs, you generally cannot simply identify the newly contributed after-tax dollars as the only money being converted. Form 8606 is used to report nondeductible traditional IRA contributions and Roth conversions, and the tax calculation takes applicable IRA balances into account. This is why I would review existing IRA balances before implementing a backdoor Roth rather than treating it as an automatic annual transaction.

Should You Prioritize Retirement Contributions in a High-Income Year?

A particularly high-income year is often a good time to revisit retirement contributions because deductible contributions may be more valuable when your marginal tax rate is higher.

This can come up after a large bonus, a particularly profitable year in a business, or another increase in taxable compensation.

The planning opportunity is not simply, “I earned more, so I should contribute more.”

Instead, I would look at the entire year.

How much income will you have? Which retirement plans are available? Have you already funded them? Would pre-tax contributions be more valuable this year than Roth contributions? Are there significant liquidity needs elsewhere? Is next year expected to look dramatically different? Retirement planning becomes much more useful when those questions are answered before December rather than after the tax return is already being prepared.

What Retirement Options Do Business Owners and Self-Employed Professionals Have?

Business owners may have retirement-plan opportunities beyond a standard IRA, and the appropriate plan depends on the business, employees, compensation, and savings goals.

Depending on the circumstances, that could include a solo 401(k), SEP arrangement, SIMPLE plan, traditional 401(k), profit-sharing contribution, or a more advanced retirement-plan design.

This is one area where I would avoid choosing a plan simply because it has the largest theoretical contribution.

A retirement plan affects more than the owner's tax deduction. Employee eligibility, required contributions, administrative costs, payroll, future hiring, and the owner's long-term savings goals can all matter. For a solo business owner with strong cash flow, the right retirement plan can create significantly more tax-advantaged savings capacity than an IRA alone. For a growing company with employees, the analysis becomes different.

Should Married Couples Coordinate Their Retirement Contributions?

Yes. Married couples can benefit from treating their retirement accounts as part of one household strategy rather than making each spouse's contribution decisions independently.

One spouse might have a particularly strong 401(k) with inexpensive investment options and a generous employer match. The other might have self-employment income that creates additional retirement-plan opportunities.

The household may also want to coordinate traditional and Roth contributions.

For example, if both spouses are high earners today, current deductions may be particularly useful. But if one spouse temporarily leaves the workforce or moves into a lower-paying role, that change could create a different Roth-versus-traditional opportunity. A nonworking or low-earning spouse may also be able to make an IRA contribution based on the couple's joint compensation when the applicable requirements are satisfied. Looking at both spouses together creates a more coherent retirement and tax strategy.

Should You Automate Retirement Contributions?

Automating retirement contributions can make it easier to invest consistently, but automation should follow strategy rather than replace it.

Payroll contributions are particularly useful because saving occurs before the money reaches your checking account.

Automatic investing also reduces the temptation to make retirement contributions based on short-term market movements.

I would still revisit the contribution percentage periodically, especially after a raise, bonus, job change, marriage, business launch, or another material shift in income. “Set it and forget it” is useful for behavior. It is less useful for tax planning.

What Happens After You Max Out Your Retirement Accounts?

After maximizing the retirement accounts that make sense for your situation, the next dollar does not necessarily need another complicated tax strategy. A taxable brokerage account can be an extremely valuable part of a long-term financial plan.

Taxable accounts provide flexibility that retirement accounts do not.

They can also be managed tax-efficiently through decisions about asset location, turnover, capital-gain realization, tax-loss harvesting, and charitable giving.

This is why I do not view retirement accounts and taxable investing as competing strategies. A well-designed financial plan may eventually contain meaningful assets in three broad tax categories: pre-tax retirement accounts, Roth accounts, and taxable investments. Each serves a different purpose.

Why Retirement Contribution Strategy Should Be Part of Tax Planning

Retirement contributions and tax planning should be considered together because the type and timing of contributions can affect both today's tax return and your future retirement income.

Tax preparation generally occurs after most of these choices have already been made.

By the time the tax return is prepared, payroll deferrals may be closed for the year, bonuses have been paid, and other financial decisions may already be complete.

Proactive planning moves the conversation earlier.

As both a CPA and CFP®, I look at retirement contributions as part of the broader financial system. The question is not merely whether you are “maxing out your 401(k).” It is whether your retirement accounts, taxable investments, current tax strategy, and future financial goals are working together.

Frequently Asked Questions About Maximizing Retirement Contributions

How can I maximize retirement contributions to lower my taxes?

High-income taxpayers can potentially reduce current taxable income by making eligible pre-tax contributions to employer retirement plans and other qualifying retirement arrangements.

The appropriate strategy depends on which plans are available, your income, whether contributions are deductible or Roth, your liquidity needs, and your expected future tax rate.

Should high-income earners use a traditional or Roth 401(k)?

High-income earners often find traditional pre-tax contributions attractive during peak-tax years because they can reduce current taxable income. Roth contributions may become relatively more attractive during lower-income years or when paying tax today is expected to be favorable compared with paying it later.

Neither account is universally better. IRS rules treat traditional employee deferrals as pre-tax while designated Roth contributions are included in current income.

Should I max out my 401(k) before investing in a brokerage account?

Not necessarily. Maximizing a 401(k) can be an excellent strategy when retirement savings and current tax benefits are priorities, but taxable brokerage accounts provide greater liquidity and flexibility.

Many high-income households ultimately need both.

Is an HSA worth maximizing for high-income earners?

For an eligible taxpayer, an HSA can be especially attractive because of its favorable tax treatment and the ability to use distributions tax-free for qualified medical expenses.

Whether you should maximize it depends on your eligibility, cash flow, healthcare needs, and other savings priorities.

Can I do a backdoor Roth if I make too much for a Roth IRA?

Potentially. High income can prevent a direct Roth IRA contribution, but taxpayers may be able to make a nondeductible traditional IRA contribution and subsequently complete a Roth conversion.

Existing traditional, SEP, or SIMPLE IRA balances can affect the taxable calculation under the pro-rata rules, so those balances should be reviewed first.

Does contributing to a 401(k) reduce taxable income?

Traditional pre-tax 401(k) elective deferrals generally reduce the wages currently subject to federal income tax, while designated Roth 401(k) contributions are made with after-tax dollars.

That current deduction is one reason traditional contributions can be valuable during high-income years.

What should I do after I max out my 401(k)?

After maximizing a 401(k), consider the other accounts available to you based on your circumstances, which might include an HSA, IRA strategy, spouse's retirement plan, business retirement plan, or taxable brokerage account.

The best next step depends on tax benefits, liquidity, investment options, employer benefits, and long-term goals.

How often should I review my retirement contributions?

Retirement contributions should generally be reviewed at least annually and whenever income or employment changes materially.

Raises, bonuses, job changes, business income, marriage, retirement, and unusually high- or low-income years can all change the appropriate contribution strategy.

Summary

  • Maximizing retirement contributions is not simply about reaching every annual limit. The more important decision is which accounts to fund and whether contributions should be pre-tax or Roth.

  • Employer retirement plans are often a logical starting point, particularly when an employer match is available.

  • High-income taxpayers may find pre-tax contributions especially valuable during peak earning years, while Roth contributions can become more attractive when taxable income is temporarily lower.

  • Eligible taxpayers should consider an HSA as part of the broader retirement and tax strategy because qualified medical distributions receive favorable tax treatment.

  • A backdoor Roth may be available to high-income taxpayers who cannot contribute directly to a Roth IRA, but existing pre-tax IRA balances can complicate the tax calculation.

  • Business owners may have additional retirement-plan options that can create greater savings capacity, but plan design should consider employees and business goals as well as the owner's tax deduction.

  • Retirement contributions, taxable investments, and tax planning work best when they are coordinated rather than managed as separate decisions.

If you are a high-income professional or business owner and want help determining how much to contribute, which accounts to prioritize, or whether pre-tax or Roth contributions make more sense, visit KCL Wealth Management to request an intro call.

Author Bio

Katherine Leonard, CPA, CFP®, is the founder of KCL Wealth Management, a fee-only wealth management firm based in Newport Beach, California. She specializes in tax-efficient financial planning and investment management, helping clients coordinate retirement savings, investments, tax planning, and their broader financial decisions.

Previous
Previous

Year-End Tax Planning Checklist: 10 Tax Moves to Review Before December 31

Next
Next

Why Clients Need Integrated Tax and Financial Planning